volume pedals

Amplifiers, effects, pickups, electronic components, wiring, etc.

Moderator: Dave Mudgett

User avatar
Samuel Phillippe
Posts: 426
Joined: 10 Jan 2022 8:11 am
Location: Douglas Michigan, USA
State/Province: Michigan
Country: United States

volume pedals

Post by Samuel Phillippe »

In your opinion which is a better volume pedal bang for the buck?
Hilton or Goodrich. I know Hiltons are more expensive but is the difference really worth the extra cost?

Sam
Donny Hinson
Posts: 21822
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Donny Hinson »

The Goodrich is fine for most, but a few like the extra treble a Hilton provides. If you want bragging rights, lots of treble, and money's no object, go for the Hilton. If you like a fuller sound and not having to plug into an AC outlet, stick with the Goodrich.
ajm
Posts: 1752
Joined: 13 Nov 1999 1:01 am
Location: Los Angeles
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by ajm »

Time out.

1) Goodrich makes several different pedals. Which one are you asking about?

2) Do you have anything else between the guitar and amp? Any other pedals?
User avatar
Jack Stoner
Posts: 22147
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kansas City, MO
State/Province: Kansas
Country: United States

Post by Jack Stoner »

I've had two Hilton's, one with attached power supply and a later model with plug in power supply, and didn't find either to be "trebly" I could use the Hilton (factory settings, no adjustments) or the Goodrich with the same amp settings and get similar sound.

Between a standard Goodrich 120 pot pedal and the Hilton, for me the Hilton wins. I don't like the volume taper of the current pots being used and that alone would point me to a Hilton. Other advantages, no periodic pot replacement and no string to break and require replacement. Basically, no maintenance with a Hilton and over time it will pay for itself.
User avatar
Larry Dering
Posts: 6056
Joined: 17 May 2013 11:20 am
Location: Missouri, USA
State/Province: Missouri
Country: United States

Post by Larry Dering »

I have several Goodrich VP and one Hilton. While I prefer the Goodrich for it's simplicity and feel, I have no issues with using the Hilton. The power supply is my only quirk. The pots and string on Goodrich can be a challenge but the new pots are long life. Overall I'm using the Goodrich.
User avatar
Samuel Phillippe
Posts: 426
Joined: 10 Jan 2022 8:11 am
Location: Douglas Michigan, USA
State/Province: Michigan
Country: United States

Post by Samuel Phillippe »

ajm wrote:Time out.

1) Goodrich makes several different pedals. Which one are you asking about?

2) Do you have anything else between the guitar and amp? Any other pedals?

1) Wasn't thinking of any one individual Goodrich but will accept your comments on any one or more of them

2)I go through a preamp to my present pedal, then a delay/reverb pedal to the amp......

Was curious because of all the comments on the two pedals and the price of each.

Thanks for your response


Sam
User avatar
Erv Niehaus
Posts: 27196
Joined: 10 Aug 2001 12:01 am
Location: Litchfield, MN, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Erv Niehaus »

I wouldn't put a preamp between my guitar and the foot pedal.
Erv
User avatar
Samuel Phillippe
Posts: 426
Joined: 10 Jan 2022 8:11 am
Location: Douglas Michigan, USA
State/Province: Michigan
Country: United States

Post by Samuel Phillippe »

Donny Hinson wrote:The Goodrich is fine for most, but a few like the extra treble a Hilton provides. If you want bragging rights, lots of treble, and money's no object, go for the Hilton. If you like a fuller sound and not having to plug into an AC outlet, stick with the Goodrich.
Thanks Donny, that was helpful.
User avatar
Samuel Phillippe
Posts: 426
Joined: 10 Jan 2022 8:11 am
Location: Douglas Michigan, USA
State/Province: Michigan
Country: United States

Post by Samuel Phillippe »

Erv Niehaus wrote:I wouldn't put a preamp between my guitar and the foot pedal.
Erv
Erv, why is that?
User avatar
Erv Niehaus
Posts: 27196
Joined: 10 Aug 2001 12:01 am
Location: Litchfield, MN, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Erv Niehaus »

I've never heard of anybody doing that.
Erv
User avatar
Samuel Phillippe
Posts: 426
Joined: 10 Jan 2022 8:11 am
Location: Douglas Michigan, USA
State/Province: Michigan
Country: United States

Post by Samuel Phillippe »

Erv Niehaus wrote:I've never heard of anybody doing that.
Erv
OOPS might be part of my tone problem,,, will take it off and see if it is different. Thanks Erv
User avatar
Erv Niehaus
Posts: 27196
Joined: 10 Aug 2001 12:01 am
Location: Litchfield, MN, USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Erv Niehaus »

Good move! :D
Erv
User avatar
Georg Sørtun
Posts: 3854
Joined: 2 Jun 2009 9:12 am
Location: Mandal, Agder, Norway
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Georg Sørtun »

FWIW, I always have a form for pre-amp before the VP, which means the brand/type of VP does not matter tonewise. Depends entirely of what pre-amp that is used and whether it is suited (regarding load, etc.) for the instrument (PU), or not.
Tucker Jackson
Posts: 1925
Joined: 8 Apr 2004 12:01 am
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
State/Province: Oregon
Country: United States

Post by Tucker Jackson »

Erv Niehaus wrote:I've never heard of anybody doing that.
Erv
Almost everyone who has Sarno's Black Box is doing that. Works well.
Donny Hinson
Posts: 21822
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Donny Hinson »

Jack Stoner wrote:I've had two Hilton's, one with attached power supply and a later model with plug in power supply, and didn't find either to be "trebly" I could use the Hilton (factory settings, no adjustments) or the Goodrich with the same amp settings and get similar sound.
Jack, I don't think anyone can argue the fact that a large percentage of players switched to the Hilton (and other powered pedals) because powered pedals maintain the treble when the pedal is backed off. Whereas, a passive pedal like the popular Goodrich, tends to reduce the treble somewhat when the pedal is backed off.

I never said the Hilton was "too trebly". You're reading something into my post that I didn't write. :mrgreen:
Matt Kidney
Posts: 54
Joined: 7 Jan 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Galway, Eire
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Matt Kidney »

I tried a friends Goodrich Omni the other day, I'm sold on it, best of both worlds active (with no attenuated treble) and passive, and can be battery powered so no extra power cable needed if that's an issue.
User avatar
Ian Rae
Posts: 6182
Joined: 10 Oct 2013 11:49 am
Location: Redditch, England
State/Province: -
Country: United Kingdom

Post by Ian Rae »

I regularly use a Hilton and a Goodrich and I find that the Hilton has greater clarity for recording (which some might call trebly I suppose).
I use the Hilton with my Telonics amp (no powersupply needed with that, just a cable) and the Goodrich when I want to travel light.
For me the Hilton is better value than the Goodrich, and also better than the Telonics, which is magnificent but has a lot of expensive features that I shall never use.
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
Robert Parent
Posts: 1133
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Gillette, WY
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Robert Parent »

Lehle mono 90 is my pick.

Robert
User avatar
Bill Terry
Posts: 2811
Joined: 29 Apr 1999 12:01 am
Location: Bastrop, TX
State/Province: Texas
Country: United States

Post by Bill Terry »

Old Guy = Old Gear

I've got a couple of Emmons drop-pin volume pedals. The pot replacement (not really very often in my experience) doesn't bother me. I like the taper of these pedals, the very 'quick' response, and the bit of top-end roll off when you back off the volume I like. I'd rather replace a pot (I've found NOS A-B pots work best, and I have a stash) once every couple of years than mess with a power supply on every gig, JMO.. I hate having a zillion things to plug-in, extra wall warts, etc.

Also when moving the steel around in my studio, or in the frantic 'band-swap' so common in many Austin area venues these days (3 bands on/off stage in the same venue in one night) the ability to just grab the steel and volume pedal and move it as one 'unit' is great. I think Buddy was the genesis of that feature for the Opry? Like many of his ideas, brilliant if you ask me.
Lost Pines Studio
"I'm nuts about bolts"
Patrick Edwards
Posts: 94
Joined: 26 Apr 2002 12:01 am
Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA
State/Province: Washington
Country: United States

Best bang for the buck

Post by Patrick Edwards »

For me , I think the Stage One volume pedal has the best bang for the buck.
It’s lite ,sturdy with modern pot, gear driven (no string) with tuner out and now costs $130 . Doug is a great guy. I sent my older Stage One vp back to him and he installed the tuner out feature; only charged shipping. I’ve been loving mine over five years with no issues..Check it out on the new Stage One website
Patrick
User avatar
Norbert Dengler
Posts: 553
Joined: 10 May 2007 12:46 pm
Location: germany
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Norbert Dengler »

another vote for the stage one. much lighter than all others but with the right geometrics and no string quirk. sounds good too very affordable too. i have two and love them.
Goodrich stays in the cabinet.
User avatar
Bill Ferguson
Posts: 5885
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Milton, FL USA
State/Province: -
Country: United States

Post by Bill Ferguson »

Pardon me for interupting here, but I believe the original question was between Goodrich and Hilton.

Both make fine pedals.

Yep the Hilton is brighter and holds the tone the same across the sweep.

However, I personally like the light tonal change of a volume pot. Of course I am old and like the tones of the past.

I have a Hilton, a Telonics and a couple of Goodrich.
My goto pedal is the Goodrich OMNI with one of the newer pots. Fits my style of playing.
And unlike Jack, I have had no problem adjusting to the slight taper difference between the new pots and the old style pots.

Just my opinion.
AUTHORIZED PEAVEY, George L's, Goodrich dealer. I have 2 steels and several amps. My current rig of choice is 1993 Emmons LeGrande w/ 108 pups (Jack Strayhorn built for me), Goodrich OMNI Volume Pedal, George L's cables and Peavey Nashville-Session 112 or 115.
User avatar
David Ball
Posts: 1321
Joined: 18 Feb 2010 1:37 pm
Location: North Carolina High Country
State/Province: North Carolina
Country: United States

Post by David Ball »

Lehle for me too. The others are really good pedals though. I've had them all I guess.

Dave
User avatar
Lee Baucum
Posts: 10853
Joined: 11 Apr 1999 12:01 am
Location: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) The Final Frontier
State/Province: Texas
Country: United States

Post by Lee Baucum »

Bill Ferguson wrote:Pardon me for interupting here, but I believe the original question was between Goodrich and Hilton.
Good point!
User avatar
Samuel Phillippe
Posts: 426
Joined: 10 Jan 2022 8:11 am
Location: Douglas Michigan, USA
State/Province: Michigan
Country: United States

Post by Samuel Phillippe »

I am reading all the responses to my question and have come to the same conclusion for all questions regarding equipment... there is no one answer, it is what We each like.

I trully thank each and everyone of you for your comments. I am not in the immediate need of another volume pedal but kept wondering if a Hilton was that much better than a Goodrich as a result in pricing difference.

I am using a Boss at presence and still trying to develop a technique....Perhaps as I become more experienced I will be buying something better, which now becomes a problem because of all the PERSONAL likes and dislikes. Nothing wrong with that, guess i just need more time to determine what I would like.

Again, thanks to all for your input and I do respect ALL your opinions.

Sam